I am an ardent supporter of women's rights. But, I have to ask: when do questions that would normally be asked of any VP hopeful, become sexist? Is the media really being sexist? Or are they trying to get to the bottom of who this rising star that showed up out of nowhere is?
I'm inclined to believe the latter. Naturally, any minority in the spotlight will have their suspicions whilst under intense and vicious scrutiny that they're somehow being marginalized for their accomplishments. And it's understandable.
But, I am of the opinion that anyone racing towards the White House, should be subjected to intense scrutiny, should be thoroughly vetted and should go through the rigmarole of media inquiries.
Yes, there's a line that can be crossed. The above does not justify calling Hillary Clinton a bitch, when she's merely assertive. The above does not justify asking Sarah Palin if she can "handle" the VP spot with her growing family, because well, that would never be asked of a man.
But, I believe it does justify asking the former mayor of Wasilla, and anyone for that matter, what kind of parent would agree to take on the potential 4 to 8 years of D.C. politics and responsibilities and put aside a four-month-old baby with special needs.
Well, probably the parent who will benefit politically.
[Source: huffingtonpost.com]
No comments:
Post a Comment